Fiedler K. In Davis C. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. Study 1 demonstrated that religiosity predicted opposition to same-sex marriage through sexual prejudice, as hypothesized. New York legalized same-sex marriage in but not before special provisions were made for religious protections within the text of the law.
For instance, it is possible that a personality variable such as conscientiousness simultaneously influenced religiosity, conservatism, and attitudes toward same-sex marriage, and it could therefore provide a further explanation of the effects we observed.
History reveals, however, that marriage laws in the U. However, the fact of the matter is that homosexuals want marriage in the purely legal form and religions do not have to approve of this. Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you.
Why do we allow inter-racial marriages? Chicago Tribune — Mary Schmich 29 February Organizations that receive public money, however, and which must adhere to anti-discrimination laws, should rightly be challenged if they engage in discrimination against a protected class of against same sex marriage debate forum in Laval.
Indeed, in the last two years, a number of top courts in more socially liberal against same sex marriage debate forum in Laval —New York, Washington state and Maryland — have rejected arguments in favor of gay unions. We also administered a more general measure of sexual prejudice rather than aversion to gay men in particular and examined self-reported willingness to protest against same-sex marriage.
Thus Massachusetts remains the only state that allows same-sex marriage; more than 10, gay and lesbian couples have married there since
The law also asserts that no state can be forced to legally recognize a same-sex marriage performed in another state. Second, for studies in which the independent and mediating variables are not under experimental control, tests of indirect effects are potentially susceptible to bias arising from common causes.
Most of the states that approved constitutional amendments banning gay marriage are in the more socially conservative South and Midwest. The law is as it has been for plus years, and so the burden is on them to make the persuasive case as to why they should be married, not just for their benefit but for what the impact is on society and marriage as a whole, and on children.
It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. General Discussion In light of current debates regarding the expansion of gay rights in several countries, including the United States, France, Ireland, Russia, and Australia, this research presents a timely investigation into the motivational underpinnings of religious opposition to same-sex marriage.