Twitter Share. The Public Sex Offender Registry may be unavailable at times due to the volume of use. The MSP has not considered or assessed the specific risk of re-offense with regard to any individual prior to his or her inclusion on the PSOR and has made no determination that any individual included in the PSOR is currently dangerous.
Find out how the program works. The MSP shall not be responsible for any errors or omissions produced by secondary dissemination of this information. Detroit U. State Rep.
A third or subsequent violation of any combination of the following: Indecent or obscene conduct in a public place - MICH. Timeframe for Registration Registered before sentencing, updated upon release; within 14 days of residing in the state; 10 days of changing the address Applies to Offenders Convicted in another State?
All charges incurred will be in US currency. Michigan state police sex offenders map in Torquay to a study by the U. Encouraging Children to Share It isn't always easy to build a trusting relationship with your child. A complete physical description of the individual.
But three out of four adolescents who were sexually assaulted were victimized by someone they knew well. Offenders weren't originally required to regularly report. Some functions of this site are disabled for browsers blocking jQuery.
Extreme care should be exercised in using any information obtained from this web site. Identify Offenders Now. Gasper also called for stricter rules governing sex offenders who move to Michigan from other states. Kidnapping if the victim is less than 18 years of age - MICH.
The Michigan State Police have gone to great lengths to assure the accuracy of the match of the photo to the sex offender. All rights reserved. If you believe that any of the information contained in these records is in error, please contact the local law enforcement agency where the sex offender resides.
Should you be unable to access the registry, please check back later. The Public Sex Offender Registry may be unavailable at times due to the volume of use. But in a May 11 letter to the Judiciary Committee, Nessel argued the proposed bill has the same constitutional problems as the existing registry law.